The idea that woman is stronger is delusional. To be more accurate it is politically correct nonsense, at least in the West...and especially in the US. Indeed, when was the last time you read an article about a successful woman and saw her described as feminine? Even beauty queens are described as "strong." It is the politically correct delusion of our time to say women are strong because the feminists did a good job of portraying "feminine" as weak. I don't think it is weak, but that is a different argument.
Men are strong, women are not. Women are nurturing, men are not. There is a little gray area and a few exceptions, but generally those statements are true. What is more interesting is woman does not want to be know as nurturing, she wants to be know as strong. Modern woman accentuates her masculine traits not her feminine ones. It is a significant social shift, and of course, is reflected in record high divorce and record low proposal rates by men. In a phrase, guys are voting on feminism with their feet, away from the alter, and wisely so. Man wants a companion in life, not a competitor.
¶ 8:00 AM
Wednesday, November 22, 2006
Tomorrow is Thanksgiving in the US, and I would like to wish my American readers a Happy Thanksgiving. There are lots of things to be thankful for, and I have noticed that thankful people are happy people. It is important to be thankful for things - whether big or small - so you don't start thinking that blessings are "entitlements" per se, and become just as bad as women and feminists and never realizing that: "...whereas you do not know what will happen tomorrow. For what is your life? It is even a vapor that appears for a little time and then vanishes away." (James 4:14).
¶ 7:22 AM
Monday, November 20, 2006
Out On The Town
My recently divorced friend wanted to go out on the town to enjoy his reclaimed freedom as a single man, having escaped the clutches of the FemBorg Collective (Anglosphere Matriarchy), due his preventative thinking about asset protection and being absolutely ruthless toward his ex-wife during the divorce process.
So I took him out with some of the older connaisseurs and showed him there is life outside of the FemBorg Collective - and not just any type of life - a grand life - with comradiery, good smokes, fun, and the full blessings of liberty. I had a table reserved at this upscale restaurant downtown and everybody met there around the planned time. To make a long story short, it was a great night, my friend could not get over the fact that men, such as myself and the others, have such happy and purposeful lives doing things we actually want to do. He admitted that he had been so brainwashed thinking life was to go to college, get a good job, get married, have kids, etc., and everybody that did not do these things were "losers". That is the FemBorg Collective thinking for you - you have no individuality, you have no purpose in life but to serve the FemBorg Collective (via assimilation which they call marriage), you have no reason in life but to be a FemBorg Matriarchal Drone serving your designated FemBorg Master (wife), and it goes on and on.
Every man has a purpose in life, whether they live up to their calling or not, is up to them, and you can also be sure the FemBorg Collective is out there looking to assimilate every man they can.
The problem is woman's all-so-self-importance gets to be tiring after a while. Modern western women have in their minds the idea that they are right, that no matter how they do things, or why, or whatever, they have the high ground on what is right. It is a unilateral arrogance that far exceeds anything male chauvinism came up with. So you read things such as:
Why don't men show more emotion? (read we women do and it is the right thing to do)
Why don't men commit more? (read we women do and it is the right thing to do)
Why don't men admit when they're sick? (read we women do and so on and so forth)
It is never...NEVER...we do it this way, men do it that way, why are we different and is that good, bad or okay. It is always: We do it this way and it is the right thing to do and why aren't men more like us because we are absolutely right.
Indeed, I read a recent article written by a woman that wrote that men who don't want to show emotions are dysfunctional...READ...we women do and it is the right thing to do, et cetera...Personally, I think reality is just the opposite, a man who shows a lot of emotion is dysfunctional.
¶ 7:35 AM
Friday, November 10, 2006
Our Guest Connaisseur writes:
Testosterone makes men stronger than women, but what nature gives it takes away and that same chemical drives men to women. Sex was the only leverage a young woman truly had over a young man. The promise of it within marriage was it's major attractant. Then came feminism with its message of "woman go have sex just like a man". Woman did and she lost her only leverage. When milk is cheap there is no reason to buy the cow, or more so, there is no reason to own a barn, or set up a homestead. Young men in their 20's, who understand the marriage sham is now up, will in a decade from now say "I have more to lose financially, I don't need her in the bedroom as much, and I can still get sex when I want it and I'm getting too old for kids" and they still won't be married. This leaves a lot of women out in the cold. For women, the trade off of sex leverage for feminism, means women will have more sex in their lives (and more STD's) but they will spend most of their lives without a man. Of course, that was the goal of feminists, only too bad they made non-feminist women their victims.
¶ 9:38 AM
Wednesday, November 8, 2006
Our Guest Connaisseur writes:
Men have all the same emotions as women have. Women show their emotions generally, men don't. That is not dysfunctional, that is diversity. Aren't women all for diversity, or are men excluded from the idea of diversity and subject only to the diversity that women defined for them?
Men are and always will be the stronger sex. Notions that they are not is silly. Without good strong men who do not show their emotions a given society will be destroyed by bad men who don't hide their emotions. The more men are gay, the more men are metrosexual, the more feminized men are, the weaker the society and the greater its chances of falling. Men being men and controlling their emotions is a good thing. Women show their emotions so much to the point it loses meaning and impact completely. A woman crying is just another woman crying...no big deal...When a man shows emotion, occasionally it shows significance and communicates the importance of the moment and worthy of it's display...Kinda of like when Mother Superior swears...it's significant. A man crying is still a significant event, I don't think it should be cheapened and lose its impact by becoming common.
In addition, emotions are a currency women revel in, and apparently it does them good to show and exchange them. To assume it is good for men to do so is patently false. Research shows the opposite. Women feel good after a cry, men feel horrible, women feel good exchanging how they feel, men want to die. Demanding that men show more emotion is as unreasonable as men demanding women show less. Men are men, women are women, viva la difference...wanting them to be alike is gendercide, and we all know whose agenda that is...Oh...And just for debate, I would add that men hitting women are just men letting their emotions out, expressing how they feel, acting female if you will.
What our society needs is stronger men in more control of themselves and showing less emotion across the board, read being less feminine. The more man a man is, the less he beats on woman. I think one of the reason we have rampant spouse abuse is because we have abandoned and criticized manly behavior -- such as demanding he show more emotions...The role of being a gentleman or of being a lady are sophisticated behaviors stemming from the different natures of man and woman. There are less gentlemen and less ladies now because we have dumbed down what it is to be a man and a woman. I think it is time for men to be men again and women to be women (no, I don't mean unequal slaves who are barefoot and pregnant.)
¶ 7:51 AM
Friday, November 3, 2006
Our Guest Connaisseur writes:
Feminism prior to 1976 was about equal rights and equal pay, after 1976 it was all about male bashing, sexism, gendercide, and still is. The educational morass of today's boys is a prime example. Prior to 1976 the feminist movement was run by heterosexual woman who liked men and who wanted men to be part of the movement. After 1976 it was run by dike lesbians who hated men and made men the scapegoat for everything. This gave rise to the "victim" mentality.
Of the multitude of social problems caused by feminism, two rise to the level of threatening our national security. First, it takes good men to stop bad men and a feminized USA is not raising enough good men willing to die for the country to keep the country safe. (No, I am not talking about Iraq.) Second, males are becoming a severely undereducated subclass. Until that horrid effect of feminism is corrected, the violence will only get worse. Men are now second-class citizens and they will take out their anger on women far worse than ever before. It is not going to be pretty, and I don't want to be around, and definitely plan not to be.
¶ 7:15 PM
The Bright Mirror reflecting masculinity for men. Saving your ass from the Matriarchy whether you like it or not. Shattering delusions so reality is clearly seen. You are ready, and the master has appeared.